Methodology White Paper
Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes Analysis for Medical-Legal Review
A Daubert-defensible methodology — applied to the specific surgeon at issue, using that surgeon's own EMR data, with disclosed limitations, confidence intervals, and reproducible methods.
What's in the white paper
- The gap in current surgical outcomes evidence
- Data sources and access paths — defense-side EMR extraction under BAA, plaintiff-side discovery production under protective order
- Risk-adjustment model specification — variables, statistical methods, peer-cohort construction
- Custom Outcomes Measures protocol — bespoke metric construction without "constructed for litigation" exposure
- Limitations — what the analysis does and does not establish (standard of care, case-specific causation explicitly excluded)
- Daubert factor mapping — point-by-point response to each factor with anticipated cross-examination
- Independence and conflict-check — structural firewall against the SurgiConnect customer base
- Synthetic sample report appendix — labeled-illustrative exemplar showing the work product format
- Engagement models, fees, and scoping workflow
Who this is for
- Defense litigation partners in medical malpractice / healthcare litigation practice groups
- Med-mal carrier claims executives and medical directors
- Hospital risk management and in-house counsel
- Plaintiff counsel where conflict-check is clean
- Healthcare regulatory counsel evaluating the methodology firm
Every recipient is conflict-checked at the firm level against active SurgiConnect customer relationships before the PDF is sent.
Request the white paper
Submit the form below. PDF arrives within one business day after conflict-check.
Time-sensitive matter? Email [email protected] directly. Or return to SurgiQuality Legal Services for the full overview of engagements, pricing, and intake.